pak 43 is too expensive OLD_TOPIC

Post Reply
NurKaiser
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2020 6:31 am

pak 43 is too expensive OLD_TOPIC

Post by NurKaiser »

Pak 43 have damage equal to flak88 looking horizontally, but costs more, soo... paks are no need, but what about making pak 43 3 turn cost like flak88?
User avatar
Shark guy 35
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 6:00 pm
Location: The United States Of America
Contact:

Re: pak 43 is too expensive

Post by Shark guy 35 »

Wait we have pak43 now :o
"A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week".
-General George S. Patton
Jasondunkel
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:52 pm

Re: pak 43 is too expensive

Post by Jasondunkel »

NurKaiser wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:22 am Pak 43 have damage equal to flak88 looking horizontally, but costs more, soo... paks are no need, but what about making pak 43 3 turn cost like flak88?
no the flak 88 is not the pak 43
the pak 43 is longer and has a higher punch. the flag 88 is a predecessor, so to speak, and fits more to the tiger I tank.
it is more like the flak 41
NurKaiser
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2020 6:31 am

Re: pak 43 is too expensive

Post by NurKaiser »

Jasondunkel wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:04 pm
NurKaiser wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:22 am Pak 43 have damage equal to flak88 looking horizontally, but costs more, soo... paks are no need, but what about making pak 43 3 turn cost like flak88?
no the flak 88 is not the pak 43
the pak 43 is longer and has a higher punch. the flag 88 is a predecessor, so to speak, and fits more to the tiger I tank.
it is more like the flak 41
I am about game, in game they have similar damage to tanks.
Post Reply

Return to “Guns (last cleanup: 20240130)”