pak 43 is too expensive OLD_TOPIC
pak 43 is too expensive OLD_TOPIC
Pak 43 have damage equal to flak88 looking horizontally, but costs more, soo... paks are no need, but what about making pak 43 3 turn cost like flak88?
- Shark guy 35
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 6:00 pm
- Location: The United States Of America
- Contact:
Re: pak 43 is too expensive
Wait we have pak43 now
"A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week".
-General George S. Patton
-General George S. Patton
-
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:52 pm
Re: pak 43 is too expensive
no the flak 88 is not the pak 43
the pak 43 is longer and has a higher punch. the flag 88 is a predecessor, so to speak, and fits more to the tiger I tank.
it is more like the flak 41
Re: pak 43 is too expensive
I am about game, in game they have similar damage to tanks.Jasondunkel wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:04 pmno the flak 88 is not the pak 43
the pak 43 is longer and has a higher punch. the flag 88 is a predecessor, so to speak, and fits more to the tiger I tank.
it is more like the flak 41