Age of Strategy Forums

the game is still there for me

DoomsdayDragonfire wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:40 pm Probably uruks should be renamed as black orcs or smt

Actually, the name "uruk" and "olog" I believe are fine because orcs, being the name originated from J.R. Tolkien's books, were used for quite some time and no one got copyright issues with them, and Uruk just means orc anyway so I think that ones safe to use.

makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:12 pm Google politics are becoming weirder and weirder.

Some of its the same with other companies too as far as copyrights go, just slight changes would need to be done on units names for them to pass.

we can do but i am sure not unit names are the problem.
i think they do not know the totally free assets we use - they dont know they are free or something.

or maybe the game name? "age of fantasdy" but it is furious they do not tell us what was the problem...

I didn't see any other game named "Age of Fantasy," in the play store, and you seem to be the only one who created an age of Fantasy titled game too since when you look it up only Your AOF shows up.

So it's gotta be the content somewhere.

But my AOF is updating as normal and is showing up in the play store as well as others ones so maybe it's an error or a miscommunication.

sure, the email i copied shows that
1. they removed it (failed some unknown check)
2. i have updated the game (simply adding the new things alex put in)
3. they have re-activated it instantly (passed the unknown check)

so it seems it was originally removed for no reason - by mistake ...

Maybe it was removed because of that wrong naming?

you measn the age of startegy everywhere?
idk maybe ... would be very funny lol

Yes. The fact that all apps were named on device same way.

I agree with maka. That was the problem in my opinion.

i dont really think so age of strategy is an "owned" app...

Maybe the multiple names have been reported

that is not a vialoation.
but whatever, the main problem they dont share us what was the reason...

I am wondering why... Shouldn't any violation be explained so that it can be "solved"?

you mean to indicate in this topic as CLOSED?

I meant from google play... removing the app without explaining why, isn't something good to do.

yes, they can do anything ...