QF 3.7 inch AA gun AT ability

[NurKaiser]

it will work same as Flak 88 and Sovet AA gun

[DreJaDe]

As a player who plays GB in many games.

Hell no! Pls no.

IRL 3.7 inch aa used as AT gun?

Still no.
You could just read some articles about it and you would see that it was almost never used as an AT gun.

[ZakTheBuilder1]

Lol that so tiny won't even hurt a panzer III

[DreJaDe]

Lol that so tiny won't even hurt a panzer III

So tiny?


This guy is bigger than a turret of a king tiger.

Basically bigger than the German 88 flak

A panzer 3 would go boom boom this is used against it.

[ZakTheBuilder1]

Holy flak I am soooo wrong about 93mm wrong.
Yeah anything would get smacked by that
What year was this thing.
Why did they not mount that on a Churchill or a gun carrier.
Did some one say it was inhumane to blow the little Fritz's in their panzers out of existence.

[Shark guy 35]

If it is this powerful, why is it only 2 turns? I personally find it to be very good, however, it looks very ugly compared to others.

[DreJaDe]

If it is this powerful, why is it only 2 turns? I personally find it to be very good, however, it looks very ugly compared to others.

Why flak 88 and Rus aa are 3 turns is because they are also used as anti tank gun while GB aa ismt

It was not used as an anti tank gun unlike the 88mm flak in IRL.

The 93mm is ugly? Look at it in pixel editors and you would see how amazing it is. Or just look it up in a bigger view.

[ZakTheBuilder1]

IRL it looks the same as the 88 just a bit bigger and longer

[HauptmannHorst]

But its Unreal. in the game the nations have different skills so not make the same United for every nation by Force. Pls

[Shark guy 35]

If it is this powerful, why is it only 2 turns? I personally find it to be very good, however, it looks very ugly compared to others.

Why flak 88 and Rus aa are 3 turns is because they are also used as anti tank gun while GB aa ismt

It was not used as an anti tank gun unlike the 88mm flak in IRL.

The 93mm is ugly? Look at it in pixel editors and you would see how amazing it is. Or just look it up in a bigger view.

I meant the design of the unit looks strange. It might look better with wheels, but its not a problem for me.

[ZakTheBuilder1]

Guess what I found a real vehicle for the gun sorry for who ever didn't want did made for anti tank purpose but the general of the Canadian armored forces made a project for the British to put the guns on a Ram tank chassis.
Look at the tanks section hehehehe.

[DreJaDe]

Guess what I found a real vehicle for the gun sorry for who ever didn't want did made for anti tank purpose but the general of the Canadian armored forces made a project for the British to put the guns on a Ram tank chassis.
Look at the tanks section hehehehe.

Pls no.

For a new tank destroyer I guess
But not as the aa being able to transform into as.

[ZakTheBuilder1]

Well at least it would move more than one