ISU-122 and ISU-152 range and class OLD_TOPIC

[NurKaiser]

how I know, both ISU-122(max firing range=19800m) and ISU-152 (max firing range=20500m) has to have a more range than 1 in game, and irl they were self propelled artillery, so I think we should change their class from heavy AT to heavy artillery. (KV-2 range for comparison is 17320)

[Jasondunkel]

both classes are in the game so every thing is right. but til now i have not found the longest shootrange for the at version. that can not be 20km

[HauptmannHorst]

how I know, both ISU-122(max firing range=19800m) and ISU-152 (max firing range=20500m) has to have a more range than 1 in game, and irl they were self propelled artillery, so I think we should change their class from heavy AT to heavy artillery. (KV-2 range for comparison is 17320)

And thats defenitely not the effective fighting range

[NurKaiser]

how I know, both ISU-122(max firing range=19800m) and ISU-152 (max firing range=20500m) has to have a more range than 1 in game, and irl they were self propelled artillery, so I think we should change their class from heavy AT to heavy artillery. (KV-2 range for comparison is 17320)

And thats defenitely not the effective fighting range

how I know, effective fire range of ISU-152 is about 17300m, while ISU-122 has the same gun as with SU-122

[NurKaiser]

both classes are in the game so every thing is right. but til now i have not found the longest shootrange for the at version. that can not be 20km

you are about SU-152 and SU-122? they aren't ISU-122 and ISU-152!!! ISU-152 and ISU-122 were self-propelled artillery like 2 of them too!!!!!

[Gruppenführer Erwin]

What does it changes if they has 20km range.They miss totally EVERYTHING.

[DreJaDe]

What does it changes if they has 20km range.They miss totally EVERYTHING.

That's why they should be artillery.

Also most artillery in the game are like that too.