Lighting spell change
Lighting spell change
I find lighting spell really useless compared to fireball
Low damage spell that only affects units not so great so I thought what if we added a stun affect to it
Upon hit enemy units are stunned for 1 turn
I believe this is possible to do since their is a curse affect.
So I all is needed is to mix the 2 will a little modification
Low damage spell that only affects units not so great so I thought what if we added a stun affect to it
Upon hit enemy units are stunned for 1 turn
I believe this is possible to do since their is a curse affect.
So I all is needed is to mix the 2 will a little modification
"The smallest pebble was once the biggest stone, the biggest stone was once bigger"
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
Lighting spell is not low damage. It deals same 10 damage as fireball.
Alas aftereffect is needed but stun is i think too powerful. Instead i would prefer to see slowing 1 aftereffect for 3 turns.
Alas aftereffect is needed but stun is i think too powerful. Instead i would prefer to see slowing 1 aftereffect for 3 turns.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
Re: Lighting spell change
A 1 turn stun too powerful?makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 4:54 am Lighting spell is not low damage. It deals same 10 damage as fireball.
Alas aftereffect is needed but stun is i think too powerful. Instead i would prefer to see slowing 1 aftereffect for 3 turns.
"The smallest pebble was once the biggest stone, the biggest stone was once bigger"
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
Aoe 1 turn stun is too powerful, yes.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
Re: Lighting spell change
Not understanding how 1 turn stun too powerful
I find slowing one too weak
Maybe slowing 2 or something
I find slowing one too weak
Maybe slowing 2 or something
"The smallest pebble was once the biggest stone, the biggest stone was once bigger"
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
Stun is curse. And aoe curse is too powerful. Even for 1 turn. Especially because it will be able to hit otherwise immune units.
Get 3 elf wizards and you can perma stun 13 units.
As for slowing 1 it is stackable with slowing 3. And for elves even such small aoe slowing will result in huge advantage.
Get 3 elf wizards and you can perma stun 13 units.
As for slowing 1 it is stackable with slowing 3. And for elves even such small aoe slowing will result in huge advantage.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
- Alexander82
- Posts: 7969
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Lighting spell change
Totally agree.makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 8:39 am Stun is curse. And aoe curse is too powerful. Even for 1 turn. Especially because it will be able to hit otherwise immune units.
Get 3 elf wizards and you can perma stun 13 units.
As for slowing 1 it is stackable with slowing 3. And for elves even such small aoe slowing will result in huge advantage.
That won't be acceptable.
Age of Fantasy design leader
- Alexander82
- Posts: 7969
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Lighting spell change
I agree with some status for lightning but what's traditionally associated with Electric damage is too strong in this game
It might, however, have one among different effects le like:
Extra damage on units that are on water tiles (aside wooden units)
Give a different kind of stun for a few turns (e.g. Units under this effect have a certain chance of failing an actions as if they have a failure)
Make extra damage on heavy armored units
Cause an attack reduction effect (a single instance allowed)
Reduce sight (useful only in maps with fog)
Make another tech called "chain lightning" that once researched increase the spell range and aoe size
Make another tech to allow lightning to be controlled better that make them hit only enemy targets (no friendly fire)
It might, however, have one among different effects le like:
Extra damage on units that are on water tiles (aside wooden units)
Give a different kind of stun for a few turns (e.g. Units under this effect have a certain chance of failing an actions as if they have a failure)
Make extra damage on heavy armored units
Cause an attack reduction effect (a single instance allowed)
Reduce sight (useful only in maps with fog)
Make another tech called "chain lightning" that once researched increase the spell range and aoe size
Make another tech to allow lightning to be controlled better that make them hit only enemy targets (no friendly fire)
Age of Fantasy design leader
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
I would prefer next:
But i think both techs must be availible only for elves. Other races must not have so good control over lighting.
And also slowing 1.Alexander82 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:00 pm Make another tech called "chain lightning" that once researched increase the spell range and aoe size
Make another tech to allow lightning to be controlled better that make them hit only enemy targets (no friendly fire)
But i think both techs must be availible only for elves. Other races must not have so good control over lighting.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
- StormSaint373
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:35 pm
- Location: USA, East Ohio
Re: Lighting spell change
I agree with the following...
• Make extra damage on heavy armored units
• Make another tech called "chain lightning" that once researched increase the spell range and aoe size
• Make another tech to allow lightning to be controlled better that make them hit only enemy targets (no friendly fire)
Maybe a single hinderance (but certainly not to the magnetude of a debuffs spell, else it will be over suggested)
I do not agree with racial specializations for magic. Techs Should be universal.
• Make extra damage on heavy armored units
• Make another tech called "chain lightning" that once researched increase the spell range and aoe size
• Make another tech to allow lightning to be controlled better that make them hit only enemy targets (no friendly fire)
Maybe a single hinderance (but certainly not to the magnetude of a debuffs spell, else it will be over suggested)
I do not agree with racial specializations for magic. Techs Should be universal.
Beware the calm before the Tempest. . .
Re: Lighting spell change
I agree to the ones that make somewhat logical sense
Extra damage on water ( for obvious reasons )
And the chain lighting tech ( I can see the user training the spell to become better at using it )
That different stun ( Cause its still a stun of some sort )
What I don't agree with is Lightning doing extra damage to heavy units. If your suggesting that cause of the metal they wear wouldn't it do the same amount without? ( getting struck by lighting )
Also this would mean fireballs would have to do extra damage to heavies also ( cause of the metal )
Lightning weapon reduce sight?
How does that happen?
And a tech that doesn't affect friendlies?
I never heard of a simple wizard able to control magic that good ( I can see this on a powerful mage tho )
This is my opinions btw
Extra damage on water ( for obvious reasons )
And the chain lighting tech ( I can see the user training the spell to become better at using it )
That different stun ( Cause its still a stun of some sort )
What I don't agree with is Lightning doing extra damage to heavy units. If your suggesting that cause of the metal they wear wouldn't it do the same amount without? ( getting struck by lighting )
Also this would mean fireballs would have to do extra damage to heavies also ( cause of the metal )
Lightning weapon reduce sight?
How does that happen?
And a tech that doesn't affect friendlies?
I never heard of a simple wizard able to control magic that good ( I can see this on a powerful mage tho )
This is my opinions btw
"The smallest pebble was once the biggest stone, the biggest stone was once bigger"
- StormSaint373
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:35 pm
- Location: USA, East Ohio
Re: Lighting spell change
Ofc. The reason why metal would be more effective...
Metal, or at least most metals, are excellent conductors of electricity.
When a circuit is established, metal is a main receptor.
Someone in armor, unless protected, would be fried. Period.
Thus the thunderstorm spell would allow extra dmg vs armored units.
I think 2x or 3x normal dmg.
Not to mention, armored opponents usually are backed up with hp, so...
Metal, or at least most metals, are excellent conductors of electricity.
When a circuit is established, metal is a main receptor.
Someone in armor, unless protected, would be fried. Period.
Thus the thunderstorm spell would allow extra dmg vs armored units.
I think 2x or 3x normal dmg.
Not to mention, armored opponents usually are backed up with hp, so...
Beware the calm before the Tempest. . .
Re: Lighting spell change
Someone would be fried without armor thoStormSaint373 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:27 pm Ofc. The reason why metal would be more effective...
Metal, or at least most metals, are excellent conductors of electricity.
When a circuit is established, metal is a main receptor.
Someone in armor, unless protected, would be fried. Period.
Thus the thunderstorm spell would allow extra dmg vs armored units.
I think 2x or 3x normal dmg.
Not to mention, armored opponents usually are backed up with hp, so...
( you get the same results )
Sure it conducts electricity but Wouldn't it do the same amount to the flesh?
"The smallest pebble was once the biggest stone, the biggest stone was once bigger"
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
I don't like idea of more damage to armored targets.
Also i don't like idea of giving those techs for upgrade lighting spell to everyone who has it.
For example: scaledfolks have storm dragon suggested. How it can "research" chain lighting or better control it?
Orcs are also not that good casters to have so good control. Or you want to say that orcs are as good in magic as humans and elves?
And for now only these 3 races have lighting in one form or another. If humans will get it than they can have upgrades as well. Dwarves and undeads are also i think not so good in magic to have them if they will get lighting spell.
Ofc i am telling only about base races. Not about subs.
Stun... i don't know about different variant.
I would prefer slowing 1.
As for "reduce sight": lighting (not a weapon) is strikes from above units and blinds with sudden light them. As i can explain it.
Also i don't like idea of giving those techs for upgrade lighting spell to everyone who has it.
For example: scaledfolks have storm dragon suggested. How it can "research" chain lighting or better control it?
Orcs are also not that good casters to have so good control. Or you want to say that orcs are as good in magic as humans and elves?
And for now only these 3 races have lighting in one form or another. If humans will get it than they can have upgrades as well. Dwarves and undeads are also i think not so good in magic to have them if they will get lighting spell.
Ofc i am telling only about base races. Not about subs.
Stun... i don't know about different variant.
I would prefer slowing 1.
As for "reduce sight": lighting (not a weapon) is strikes from above units and blinds with sudden light them. As i can explain it.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
Re: Lighting spell change
Seems all 3 of us has mix Ideas
Alex Or Dev what you think on the matter?
Alex Or Dev what you think on the matter?
"The smallest pebble was once the biggest stone, the biggest stone was once bigger"
- Alexander82
- Posts: 7969
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Lighting spell change
I meant those techs for spells, not breath (since it is a more physical form of effect).
I think that orcs should have the same techs too sonce the warlock was meant to be specialized in destruction magic.
The elven mage is an all round mage and it uses also nature magic and other kind of spells.
If I had to choose in terms of background I'd give these to warlock (it also makes more sense since orcs will shoot these when most of their melee units are in range).
Said that I'd like more to have more shared techs and I think this can be a good addition of magic techs for both races.
Also, since both races have a specific building for that, I would remove the lightning research from tcs and put that in these buildings only.
Also lightning tech should cost a bit more (right now it costs 3 and fireball is 8 )
I think that orcs should have the same techs too sonce the warlock was meant to be specialized in destruction magic.
The elven mage is an all round mage and it uses also nature magic and other kind of spells.
If I had to choose in terms of background I'd give these to warlock (it also makes more sense since orcs will shoot these when most of their melee units are in range).
Said that I'd like more to have more shared techs and I think this can be a good addition of magic techs for both races.
Also, since both races have a specific building for that, I would remove the lightning research from tcs and put that in these buildings only.
Also lightning tech should cost a bit more (right now it costs 3 and fireball is 8 )
Age of Fantasy design leader
- Alexander82
- Posts: 7969
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Lighting spell change
Btw the sight reduction was also some sort of stun and/or caused by the flash of light
Age of Fantasy design leader
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
Fireball research cost 6 turns.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
- Alexander82
- Posts: 7969
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Lighting spell change
Ok, I see. So what about bringing lightning to a similar cost and put it only in a specific building?
Age of Fantasy design leader
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
If lighting will get its own on-hit effect tham depending on it research cost i think can be increased to 5-7 turns.
For example if slowing 1 is added than i think research cost for lighting must be 5 turns. Fireball is still better in terms of damage because of dodge and huge damage to building so in this case it must cost more.
Agree with putting it into specific building.
For example if slowing 1 is added than i think research cost for lighting must be 5 turns. Fireball is still better in terms of damage because of dodge and huge damage to building so in this case it must cost more.
Agree with putting it into specific building.
Last edited by makazuwr32 on Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
- makazuwr32
- Posts: 7830
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:29 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: Lighting spell change
And about on-hit effect — i would prefer slowing 1 still becuase
1. It is used already in lighting weapon effect.
2. Elves and orcs will get way to slow otherwise immune to magic units.
3. I just want to make more ways of applying any slowing.
1. It is used already in lighting weapon effect.
2. Elves and orcs will get way to slow otherwise immune to magic units.
3. I just want to make more ways of applying any slowing.
AoF Dev Co-Leadermakazuwr32 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:54 amWhen you ask to change something argument why...
Put some numbers, compare to what other races have and so on...
© by Makazuwr32™.
- Alexander82
- Posts: 7969
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm