New look for ships SKIN IMPLEMENTED

[Stratego (dev)]

email me and i send u all ship images in a zip file!

daniel

[InSanituu]

Is it to the mezes one Or another email?

[Stratego (dev)]

I sent you!

[InSanituu]

Here they are!

Tho i think i made Graf way too large ahah

[DreJaDe]

I know that this will be accepted already, but I'm just going to say it still.

The hull of the ship are high, they should be sinking in water.

[DreJaDe]

Another thing.

The high council demands you to remove the swastika.

[InSanituu]

I know that this will be accepted already, but I'm just going to say it still.

The hull of the ship are high, they should be sinking in water.

Aight I'll try to do this as quickly as i can
Do you have any specific ships here that i should do that to or just all of em?

I'll be removing the swastika then

[DreJaDe]

I know that this will be accepted already, but I'm just going to say it still.

The hull of the ship are high, they should be sinking in water.

Aight I'll try to do this as quickly as i can
Do you have any specific ships here that i should do that to or just all of em?

I'll be removing the swastika then

Most of the ships even the submarine besides the carrier.

You can look at their depiction and their pictures on the internet.

The models will have this redline which is the part that should be below or just the tip of the water.

[Stratego (dev)]

all of them are AWESOME!

yes plese remove the nazi signs and that is all! thanks!

[InSanituu]

Here are the ships that has more of their hull underwater
And the carrier without the swastika

[InSanituu]

Resending the U-boat cuz i forgot to remove the team color on it's tower thing

[Stratego (dev)]

i love them!
if there is no other suggestion we can put it in! thanks!

[Shark guy 35]

Maybe we can substitute the swastika with the Iron Cross, or the Balkenkreuz.

[InSanituu]

Maybe we can substitute the swastika with the Iron Cross, or the Balkenkreuz.

[Shark guy 35]

That's better

[InSanituu]

King George

[Stratego (dev)]

all ships are awesome i am wondering if we can make them 1 px thicker (i mean eg. the King George is very thin like a needle) but i will try showing what i mean with a sample image

[InSanituu]

Aight so i thickened the deck and moved the bridge and others a bit higher if this is what you meant

[Stratego (dev)]

i think it is awesome!
we should put them in!

others what u think?

(can u make this small thickening on other ships too? would be awesome! - i mean only the DD, CA and BB ships only, aircarriers and submarines are good already imho!)


also above i saw a much better ship body on this image "German_BB_Bismarck_version2.png (2.38 KiB) Viewed 69 times" was it intentionally reduced ship body height? i loved that curve in the front - or the reason was they were more deep in water irl? update: i saw in here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_ba ... p_Bismarck that they were more deep in water as your last ship images properly shows it... however i liked the first body shape - would it look bad keeping that nice deep shape but little transparent where it is under water? - like it were seen tru water instead of the current mirror-reflection? - just wondering.

[ZakTheBuilder1]

I think it looks great! cant wait

[InSanituu]

i think it is awesome!
we should put them in!

others what u think?

(can u make this small thickening on other ships too? would be awesome! - i mean only the DD, CA and BB ships only, aircarriers and submarines are good already imho!)


also above i saw a much better ship body on this image "German_BB_Bismarck_version2.png (2.38 KiB) Viewed 69 times" was it intentionally reduced ship body height? i loved that curve in the front - or the reason was they were more deep in water irl? update: i saw in here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_ba ... p_Bismarck that they were more deep in water as your last ship images properly shows it... however i liked the first body shape - would it look bad keeping that nice deep shape but little transparent where it is under water? - like it were seen tru water instead of the current mirror-reflection? - just wondering.

Ok I'll try to do that, is it only for Bismarck or should i do it to the rest of the BBs?

[InSanituu]

I did what you said for the BBs and i've thickened the deck and raised the bridge and others a lil bit for the CA and DDs

[InSanituu]

Tho i wasn't sure if this is what you meant for the BBs

[Stratego (dev)]

they re cool!

BB-s: yes! almost! i suggested being transparent that part (so will seem being in water when we place on water tile) - or is it tranparnt already?

[Stratego (dev)]

i saw u made tranparency, i tried to see on water (i placed a random water color maybe not same as in game) and i made more 50% tranparency on bottom part what do u think? (one is your version other is my with extra transparency)

which do u like?
or the previous version is better (by hiding bottom part) i am not sure?
i made sample for that too so now we see here:
a) with reflection
b) with bottom tranparent your way
c) my extra tranparent (50% layer tranparency)

which is best?

[InSanituu]

Well since you wanted the bottom to be noticable

I'd say C is the best one

[Stratego (dev)]

yes i suggested - but if u think not so good i do not "want" it that much to fight for it

others? idea?

[InSanituu]

B my version, is very dark and it doesn't blend well with the water ahah

So it's either A or C, they both blend well with the water

[Stratego (dev)]

than my suggestion is to put into game now with "A" (reflection)

and if others like better the C (we waiting some feedbacks here) than only that case we go for C.


what do u think?

[InSanituu]

Yeah, good enough for me