C47 have a wrong cost IMPLEMENTED

[DreJaDe]

Looking at the ju52, it has a speed of 265 kmh amounting to 4 speed in game.

But c47 have 360kmh but only have 5 speed. But it should have 6 based on the formula of dividing the paratrooper plane to 60.

Can you check this?
@Jasondunkel
@Stratego (dev)

Also, can we reduce the paratrooper plan cost to 4?

They are really hard to use, so expensive, and always need aircraft carrier even though they shouldnt even be able to do that.

[Stratego (dev)]

these are the values in xls
c47 : 360
ju52: 265

US Douglas_C-47_Skytrain 1941- 8000 360 2500
GB Douglas_C-47_Skytrain 1941- 8000 360 2500
GER Ju52 1931- 5700 265 1000
JP Ki-34 Thora 1936- 3500 360 1200


are these wrong?

the equation is now dividing speed by 70 and rounding.

is that ok?

[DreJaDe]

these are the values in xls
c47 : 360
ju52: 265

US Douglas_C-47_Skytrain 1941- 8000 360 2500
GB Douglas_C-47_Skytrain 1941- 8000 360 2500
GER Ju52 1931- 5700 265 1000
JP Ki-34 Thora 1936- 3500 360 1200


are these wrong?

the equation is now dividing speed by 70 and rounding.

is that ok?

I thought it was being divided by 60?
Though the problem now is more of the cost than the speed. As its to costly to be effectively used

[Stratego (dev)]

ok but what u mean they need aircraft carrier?

[Jasondunkel]

we can do the paratroopers at 4 costs. the planes are not specially armored and they are very slow.

the question will be whether there will be a kind of spem with the lower costs.

dre will say that the paratroopers in the game move faster when they move with an aircraft carrier.

the consideration here could be that we take the paratoopers out of the actual xls and give them all a movement of 7-8, for example, so they could then be used a little more effectively

should we increase the range, however, the costs should not be reduced

[DreJaDe]

we can do the paratroopers at 4 costs. the planes are not specially armored and they are very slow.

the question will be whether there will be a kind of spem with the lower costs.

dre will say that the paratroopers in the game move faster when they move with an aircraft carrier.

the consideration here could be that we take the paratoopers out of the actual xls and give them all a movement of 7-8, for example, so they could then be used a little more effectively

should we increase the range, however, the costs should not be reduced

Spamming it is the way to use it.
Thats how it was used IRL.

Fighters on the other hand only needs few of them and still cause havoc among bomber formation.

Also want to them to be in tc.

[Jasondunkel]

hmm richtig viele luftlandeoperationen habe ich jetzt nicht in er innerung. richtig einfallen ist die einanhme von kreta und operation market garden. sonst war meinens wissens nach sowas untergeordent. also sehe ich dort keine notwendigkeit vom spam . also sehe ich auch keine notwendigkeit paratooprs in tc zu bauen
......
i translated it as Jason posted german accidentally:

hmm i don't really remember many airborne operations. really come up with the taking of crete and operation market garden. otherwise, as far as I know, something was subordinate. So I don't see any need for spam there. so i see no need to build paratooprs in tc either

[DreJaDe]

hmm richtig viele luftlandeoperationen habe ich jetzt nicht in er innerung. richtig einfallen ist die einanhme von kreta und operation market garden. sonst war meinens wissens nach sowas untergeordent. also sehe ich dort keine notwendigkeit vom spam . also sehe ich auch keine notwendigkeit paratooprs in tc zu bauen
......
i translated it as Jason posted german accidentally:

hmm i don't really remember many airborne operations. really come up with the taking of crete and operation market garden. otherwise, as far as I know, something was subordinate. So I don't see any need for spam there. so i see no need to build paratooprs in tc either

Normandy landing required 13k Americans and 8k British paratroopers

Market required 34k paratroopers

operation varsity have 16k paratroopers

Soviet Dnipier airborne operation have 6k paratroopers

Ockenburg by germany have 8k paratroopers

sufficed to say, they are heavily spammed in many cases in the war

[Jasondunkel]

in the amount of used troops always very little. there are quite a few in operation market garden. So I still see no reason to have them specially built in tc's.
in most games you will have 2 plus x airfields where you can build enough paratroopers

[DreJaDe]

in the amount of used troops always very little. there are quite a few in operation market garden. So I still see no reason to have them specially built in tc's.
in most games you will have 2 plus x airfields where you can build enough paratroopers

I have at least 5 where they were spammed and could have said more BTW.

I know the germand didnt do it that much but allies is a different story..

I guess thats fine. So I guess its ok for ally to have less costly and available in tc then?

Like the me262 of germany

[Jasondunkel]

ith consultation of stratego

Paratroopers cost reduced to 4 but remain on airfield for building

[Stratego (dev)]

yes, and also it is in.