version 0.18 - CLOSED version

In this forum I post the changes on the DEVELOPER version of the game.
These versions are (at the time i post them) not yet published to google play, only registered testers can download it and test it before publishing.
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

version 0.18 - CLOSED version

Post by Stratego (dev) »

ok, gem game fixes:
- you see in the join network game list if bet game
- in "you win" dialog you see the gems you won.

up on server in 5 minutes.

please someone check tru all texting about this because i feel that the term "bet" is a bit awkie, but a native english tounged please tell me what to change.
(i can send the whole texting if that helps)
thanks!

here are the textings:
<string name="dialog_game_setup_bet"># gems to join</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_cb_bet">Bet game!\n\nRules:\n1. only network games can be bet games (with at least one multiplayer selected)\n2.You as the game creator must also pay the bet\n3. All joining human players also pay in the bet\n4. The winner will get the sum of gems all the players paid in.\n5. Maximum bet is 20 Gems\n6. If more than one human players won, the reward is divided betw. them rounded up.\n6. You can not get your gems back until the game is finished!</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_launch_stupid_bet_in_local_game">Bet is only needed if you run a MULTIPLAYER game (with at least one multiplayer selected)</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_launch_too_big_bet">Maximum bet is 20 Gems</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_ask_sure_join_with_bet">This game will cost you Gems! This is a Bet game!\n\nJoin only if you are SURELY about to finish the game!\n\nA network game may last for few days (depending on other players response time).\n\n So please be sure you will finish the game! - and you will not ruin the play of others by not taking your turn in a reasonable time\nStill Join?</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_ask_sure_create_with_bet">This game will cost you Gems! This is a Bet game!\n\nCreate a game only if you are SURELY about to finish the game!\n\nA network game may last for few days (depending on other players response time).\n\n So please be sure you will finish the game! - and you will not ruin the play of others by not taking your turn in a reasonable time\nStill create the game?</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_launch_not_enough_gems_to_pay_bet">You have no enough gems to pay the Bet for this Bet game!</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_bet_txt">Bet game:</string>
<string name="network_notif_bet_received">Age of Strategy: Bet won:</string>
<string name="network_notif_bet_received2">Bet won:</string>
<string name="list_item_bet_text">Bet:</string>
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

You might change the word "bet" to "wager"-it's a little more refined and civilised...and insert in the title "wager match-entry fee required"
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: version 0.18

Post by COOLguy »

Ok,

inserting Max-Damage's suggestion and correcting some grammatical errors (also in manuscript form) here is the new text. Tell me if it works.

<string name="dialog_game_setup_bet"># gems to join</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_cb_bet">a Wager Game!\n\nRules:\n1. only network games can have a wager

games (having at least one player as multiplayer selected)\n2.You, as the game creator must also pay the wager

\n3. All joining human players must also pay in the wager\n4. The winner will get the sum of gems all

the players paid in.\n5. Maximum wager is 20 Gems\n6. If more than one human players win, the

reward is divided between them rounded up.\n6. You can not get your gems back until the game is

finished!</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_launch_stupid_bet_in_local_game">A wager is only for a MULTIPLAYER game (having at least one player as multiplayer selected)</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_launch_too_big_bet">Maximum wager is 20 Gems</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_ask_sure_join_with_bet">This game will cost you Gems! This is a

Wager Game!\n\nJoin only if you will FINISH the game!\n\nA network game may last for

few days (depending on the other players' response time).\n\n So please be sure you will finish the

game! - and not ruin the game for others by not taking your turn in a reasonable time

\nStill Join?</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_ask_sure_create_with_bet">This game will cost you Gems! This is

a Wager Game!\n\nCreate a game only if you will FINISH the game!\n\nA network game

may last for few days (depending on the other players' response time).\n\n So please be sure you will

finish the game! - and not ruin the game for others by not taking your turn in a

reasonable time\nStill create the game?</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_launch_not_enough_gems_to_pay_bet">You do not have enough gems to

play this Wager Game!</string>
<string name="dialog_game_setup_bet_txt">Bet game:</string>
<string name="network_notif_bet_received">Age of Strategy: Wager won:</string>
<string name="network_notif_bet_received2">Wager won:</string>
<string name="list_item_bet_text">Wager:</string>
Thanks!
Josh
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

wager: i did not even hear this word before and i am afraid that non natives either (please confirm me other european forumers! thanks!)

We need a word that is so common and simple so everyone (an uneducated native, or a foreigner) will understand.

so this is why i chose "bet" or "betting", i only "feel" that i use is clumsily in my sentences.

other words that could be ok, and commonly known
- champ(inonship) game
- fee
- paying game
- award(ed)/(ing) game
- prize(d) game
- gem winning game
- Geme :) :) (meaning gem paying game)

or such are widely known words i think.

but actually "bet"/"betting" is very good i only think it is weird how i use it.
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

Your usage is fine...it's clear and simple...i thought you meant you didn't like the word... ;-)
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
draakjee
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:27 am

Re: version 0.18

Post by draakjee »

the only reason i know what "wager" is, is because i learned it at school. so it's not really common imo :)

the only word i could come up with that hasn't been said yet, is "gamble/gambling"
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

That works, too... :-)
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: version 0.18

Post by COOLguy »

Well the grammar is corrected now. Just change all instances of "wager" to what you will and it will all be fine and dandy. :)
Just remember your article adjectives, please. :D
Thanks!
Josh
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

ok! thanks!
(i did not understand the adjactive part :))
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

Daniel (the dev) wrote:ok! thanks!
(i did not understand the adjactive part :))
An Adjective is a descriptive term that modifies a noun...
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

i know that, but i did not undeerstand why he wrote it. :)
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

Daniel (the dev) wrote:i know that, but i did not undeerstand why he wrote it. :)
Oh, okay...i didn't, either... :lol:
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: version 0.18

Post by COOLguy »

Article Adjectives: "a", "an", and "the".

I know you have articles, but your English had forgotten them all. :)
Thanks!
Josh
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

COOLguy wrote:Article Adjectives: "a", "an", and "the".

I know you have articles, but your English had forgotten them all. :)
And you say I pick on the guys too much!!! :lol:
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: version 0.18

Post by COOLguy »

Oh boo hoo. :)

If it is on the forum, I don't care as long as I can understand it. But we were asked to polish this for the official game. :)
Thanks!
Josh
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

I know, I'm just jerkin' your chain!! :-P
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: version 0.18

Post by COOLguy »

Okay if it's a personal joke let's PM! :) ;)
That way we don't push patroid's buttons. :)
Because we are pointlessly posting now... :)
Thanks!
Josh
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

FINE!!!!!!!! :-P
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
patroid
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:58 am
Location: Germany, Berlin

Re: version 0.18

Post by patroid »

Its yust bad if you post in hundreds of different topics
It dont make any difference for me to view hundred
Or one post in a topic (ok a small difference but nothing
That make trouble for me)

Patroid
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

- Stone bridge can be built only by humans.
- new TC generation logic: if there are fewer players than 4 than the generator will think there are 4 players - placing TC-s around the "imaginary" players too.

up on server in 5 minutes.
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

all great structures (mansion, great tree ...) and the production in them are gone out to upgrades!
and also you have uruk hai as an upgrade for the orcs.
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

Daniel (the dev) wrote:all great structures (mansion, great tree ...) and the production in them are gone out to upgrades!
and also you have uruk hai as an upgrade for the orcs.
yay!! :-)
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
User avatar
patroid
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:58 am
Location: Germany, Berlin

Re: version 0.18

Post by patroid »

In my opinio one turn for the uruk hai
Is a bit to op i think its batter if he cost 2.

Patroid
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

bummer, you be right :)
6 turns?
User avatar
patroid
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:58 am
Location: Germany, Berlin

Re: version 0.18

Post by patroid »

I say 4 To 5.
max-damage
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:04 am
Location: right behind you...

Re: version 0.18

Post by max-damage »

5 sounds right...
It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt...
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

the green techs are ready from here:http://www.ageofstrategy.net/viewtopic. ... 339&p=8169, please test them and give me feedback - thanks!
(up on server in 10 minutes)
Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 15741
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: version 0.18

Post by Stratego (dev) »

these viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1339#p7954 are in.
and all have unique images for the techs.

and also experimentally the wolf rider's power cut down to 12.

up on server in 5 minutes.
User avatar
patroid
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:58 am
Location: Germany, Berlin

Re: version 0.18

Post by patroid »

Make wolf raiders power back tp the old.one.
Cauae wolf raiders with a few wizards or
Howevrer are the elite army of the orcs.

Orcs loose against epves and undead and
If a human player survive long enough also
Against them...


Patroid
User avatar
balint
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:38 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: version 0.18

Post by balint »

yeah, but the orcs are infantry oriented nation. we should strengthen their infantry instead.
This is Hungary and winter is coming.
Post Reply

Return to “DEVELOPER version changes”