Page 1 of 1
Horrible hussars - IMPLEMENTED
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 5:03 pm
by DoomCarrot
Ok, so whats the deal with the hussars and hungarian hussars?
Are they not just pretty looking knights? There is honestly a bigger difference between a knight and a heavy knight than there is between a knight and a hussar.
Does anybody really spend extra turns to have a black horse instead of a brown horse?
SUMMARY: hussars are stupid imho, I'm sorry, but it is tragically true.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:36 pm
by COOLguy
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:41 pm
by DoomCarrot
Don't knights pretty much mop up infantry as well?...
But ok, I guess if people like them, there is no reason for this topic, my apologies.
End. Of.Scene.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:05 pm
by Alexander82
Well, i'm not a big fun of hussars either, i thnk that heavy knight just are better, i would make them cheaper,
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 1:42 am
by COOLguy
I'M STILL RANTING AND THROWING A TANTRUM!!!
lol to each his own.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:58 pm
by Ness
Hussar is stronger than knight and faster but Hungarian hussar is weaker than knight and Hungarian hussar cost more. Why?
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:33 pm
by balint
idk.
by the way:
the point of Hungarian hussar would be this: Has a good damage, but fast and mobile. They should vost same as knights and have bonus against pikeman.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 2:44 pm
by DoomCarrot
Idk, I guess. It is also just kinda weird how there are hussars fighting spartans though, thats like two millenia collide
EDIT: Hussars were a "light" cavalry used during the age of guns and cannons, mostly used for quickly flanking positions as enemy lines tried to reload their muskets. They were used heavily in the Napoleonic Wars.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 5:56 pm
by Alexander82
They might gain multiple, less powerful, attacks and a double movement (can spend their movement between their attack actions)
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 3:09 pm
by Ness
Hungarian hussar should cost 4 and Hussar 5
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:06 pm
by DoomCarrot
Ness, I agree. Thats kinda what I made this topic about.
A heavy knight is FAAAAR more effective than a hungarian hussar, considering it costs a turn less, which makes a big difference in a big game, where you are producing them in 4 stables at the same time.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:23 pm
by Stratego (dev)
Coolguy please suggest here smth.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:57 pm
by COOLguy
Ness wrote:Hungarian hussar should cost 4 and Hussar 5
Do we want to try it? The old Hoplite got taken down a cost turn...
I am okay with trying it out.
Re: Horrible hussars
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:22 pm
by Stratego (dev)
ok, in next will be as such.
Re: Horrible hussars - IMPLEMENTED
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:50 pm
by DoomCarrot
Yay!
Also, I am really embarrassed by the revival of this topic, I had so little knowlegde of this game's strategy and their purpose when I made this topic, now I love them in certain situations
Re: Horrible hussars - IMPLEMENTED
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:23 pm
by TheBluePhoenix
I will now be making a lot of hussars it seems..
Re: Horrible hussars - IMPLEMENTED
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:08 pm
by DoomCarrot
^^ They might outclass heavy knights even