Forums for the FREE Android Game "Age of Strategy" (AOS)
http://ageofstrategy.net/
ok, the modding fix is there, please check. (however it is only an attempt - worked for me but there are many device types...)General Brave wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:57 am Okay I see why the modded version isn't working, hopefully you can fix what's the problem.
)
you must think me crazy, yes I plan to do that the games already complained about my over amount of maps. Course I'll have to make new ones but the hardest part is the terrain and map size. The story comes easily.
Still bugged.makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 7:15 am Well. This new minimal damage still acts weird.
@Stratego (dev), @Alexander82
My basic quick archer with 5 damage deals to imperial shielder (8 p.armor) 4 damage/shot.
With clear vision effect 6 damage/shot.
Under effect of group attack from ent 7 damage/shot. (All previous effect stacked).
With first tier of bow upgrades 9 damage/shot.
My normal archer deals 10 damage/shot to him with first tier of bow upgrades and under effect of clear vision. But when he is under group attack effect he deals 1 damage.
They haven't any listed bonuses to imperial shielder.
In general if archer of elves has less damage than enemy imperial shielder has armor than he deals more damage.
If he has more damage than enemy has armor than he deals normally his damage lowered by p.armor of enemy.
Many maps are bugged by poor design, balance changes, etc. and completely unwinnable. Many more are simply too difficult, virtually requiring gem spells to have a chance at winning for all but the most skilled players. I'd consider myself fairly skilled, but I can't win half the campaigns and skirmish maps. Besides, we really need opportunity for around twice as many gems as are required for all upgrades. This problem really is serious, but I think most forumers have won their gems in bet games, paid for them, or earned them by helping develop and test the game. It might help to have some kind of daily login bonus, or a challenge of the day like "produce X number of a certain unit" or "capture X number of tcs" or even "win a random game against 3 allied AI players on hard difficulty" to ease the burden of making maps and give recurring options to earn gems. If the option to watch ads were functioning all the time, it would help too.Stratego (dev) wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:44 pm i have queried and now we have
paid maps: 256 so -> 1024 gems
all upgarde gemcost: 1011
so we are almost ok
I just pay for everything but yes you are rightSunrise Samurai wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:27 amMany maps are bugged by poor design, balance changes, etc. and completely unwinnable. Many more are simply too difficult, virtually requiring gem spells to have a chance at winning for all but the most skilled players. I'd consider myself fairly skilled, but I can't win half the campaigns and skirmish maps. Besides, we really need opportunity for around twice as many gems as are required for all upgrades. This problem really is serious, but I think most forumers have won their gems in bet games, paid for them, or earned them by helping develop and test the game. It might help to have some kind of daily login bonus, or a challenge of the day like "produce X number of a certain unit" or "capture X number of tcs" or even "win a random game against 3 allied AI players on hard difficulty" to ease the burden of making maps and give recurring options to earn gems. If the option to watch ads were functioning all the time, it would help too.Stratego (dev) wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:44 pm i have queried and now we have
paid maps: 256 so -> 1024 gems
all upgarde gemcost: 1011
so we are almost ok
please open individual topics for such maps, and if comes out it needs change i will look up the designer and ask to change.maps are bugged by poor design, balance changes, etc. and completely unwinnable
makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 6:49 pmStill bugged.makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 7:15 am Well. This new minimal damage still acts weird.
@Stratego (dev), @Alexander82
My basic quick archer with 5 damage deals to imperial shielder (8 p.armor) 4 damage/shot.
With clear vision effect 6 damage/shot.
Under effect of group attack from ent 7 damage/shot. (All previous effect stacked).
With first tier of bow upgrades 9 damage/shot.
My normal archer deals 10 damage/shot to him with first tier of bow upgrades and under effect of clear vision. But when he is under group attack effect he deals 1 damage.
They haven't any listed bonuses to imperial shielder.
In general if archer of elves has less damage than enemy imperial shielder has armor than he deals more damage.
If he has more damage than enemy has armor than he deals normally his damage lowered by p.armor of enemy.
[/quot@Stratego (dev) I think you have to edit the propoerty in the way it always deal powerbase only if the output damage is minor than powerbase.
Also it shouldn't stack with anything (minimum guaranteed damage mustn't be over 4 when you buff the archer).
How exactly do you get the assassin to steal? Might be best to make it an active ability, to make it easier to use.Stratego (dev) wrote: ↑Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:25 am changes:
- human assassin can steal techs from tc-s again
- before stealing the "stealable techs" are listed in the dialog (good for testing of the stealing mechanism)
- you can set for any tech a "equivalent" list so you can say X elven tech is the same as the Y dwarf tech, so you can steal with dwarf from an elf TC. (see details in modding section)
- also there is the first steps of easter egg options, there is sample in the shoplist (i am waiting for json from Alexander tough)
uos 10
Alexander82 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:54 am@Stratego (dev) I think you have to edit the propoerty in the way it always deal powerbase only if the output damage is minor than powerbase.makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 6:49 pmStill bugged.makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 7:15 am Well. This new minimal damage still acts weird.
@Stratego (dev), @Alexander82
My basic quick archer with 5 damage deals to imperial shielder (8 p.armor) 4 damage/shot.
With clear vision effect 6 damage/shot.
Under effect of group attack from ent 7 damage/shot. (All previous effect stacked).
With first tier of bow upgrades 9 damage/shot.
My normal archer deals 10 damage/shot to him with first tier of bow upgrades and under effect of clear vision. But when he is under group attack effect he deals 1 damage.
They haven't any listed bonuses to imperial shielder.
In general if archer of elves has less damage than enemy imperial shielder has armor than he deals more damage.
If he has more damage than enemy has armor than he deals normally his damage lowered by p.armor of enemy.
Also it shouldn't stack with anything (minimum guaranteed damage mustn't be over 4 when you buff the archer).